Given that I believe in natural selection, I have a theory: I think every sentient species in the universe goes through an awkward phase when the development of medicine causes natural selection to be halted, by allowing the survival of those who would have otherwise died. This changes the governing mechanism of survival from traditional Darwinism into Social Darwinism, where it is survival of the richest (and those in the best society) instead of survival of the fittest. Case in point: Genetically, we’re generally decendents of the richer people who lived in the middle-ages, not the poorer ones; they didn’t survive to reproduce as much.
Said awkward phase goes on, weakning the gene pool, as people who would have died in the old order survive and reproduce in the new order. Birth defects, bad eyesight, and other genetic illnesses propagate at a higher rate due to the people simply not dying.
Finally, all species that develop science must eventually conquer their own DNA or DNA equivalent. At this point, the science of genetics takes over. Once medical services are properly socialized throughout the whole species, defects like imperfect eyesite can be permanently ironed out. And to stop pesky mutations from watering down our DNA again in the future, natural evolution itself could be “almost” permanently halted by introducing error-correction code at a DNA level; first using parity, and later using more sophisticated techniques such as CRC checks. A lot of our DNA code is unused, and we can certainly set it up so that it repairs bad mutations.
Once this happens, natural selection has stopped, and even social darwinism has stopped. Once genetic mastery is achieved, the perfect being can be developed. Caution must be taken to ensure that peopel do not lose genetic diversity; everybody can’t be perfect in the same way or we would become vulnerable as an entire species — one plague could kill us all if we had the same immune system.
But there’s no reason everyone can’t be more or less perfect in his or her own way, and no reason that we can’t make ourselves a much more powerful species than we currently are. This may be the key to space travel and colonizing other planets: Don’t terraform the planets to suit the humans; change the humans to suit the planets. It’s probably far easier.
Mood: $63 for a tank of gas?!?!?!?!?! KILL! KILL! KILL!
Music: Mose Giganticus – Connect That Wire To The Black Wire
June 20, 2008 at 6:09 PM
This reminds me of our little genetic debate over on Ideonexus’ blog. I’ve come to take a stronger belief towards this thinking. Am unsure of the perfect human being situation. That seems so relative. Hopefully its not the government that makes that decision.
I think the progress of medicine is only a part of the cause for Social Darwinism. Technology in all parts such as manufacturing, agriculture, etc allow for easier living. Less hard ships that may kill you. Less hard ships that really challenge you.
I also think a decline in “survival of the fittest” began when humans became the dominant species. We have no real predator in which we must be careful of. No predator to force us to stay alive…so our DNA gets lazy. You can especially notice this affect in other “dominant” species on isolated islands.
October 14, 2009 at 6:15 PM
That goes along with an acquaintance’s political theory that the world would be better with more tigers. Both politically, and religiously. “There should be more tigers.”
June 22, 2008 at 1:40 PM
Good point about the agriculture/etc!
June 24, 2008 at 8:39 PM
Excellent post. I agree with much of your speculation.
I think my only quibble is that, if we become masters of our own DNA, then we trade biological evolution for ideological evolution. Instead of genes we have memes, as Richard Dawkins explained. People who design the best DNA will survive, and those who choose less successful DNA will go extinct. Something like that is taking place in society right now.
June 25, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Clint, I could not agree with you more.
July 1, 2008 at 3:07 AM
[...] free of the breast cancer gene, removing the disease from their lineage. Now consider the truth in Clint’s prediction concerning humans evolving [...]
July 9, 2009 at 5:35 PM
Stephen Hawking says humans have entered a new stage of evolution:
http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/07/03/2241207/Hawking-Says-Humans-Have-Entered-a-New-Stage-of-Evolution?from=rss
October 14, 2009 at 8:31 PM
So the people who choose to stick with the old ways and not get all the weird DNA changes or cybernetics would be the ones who will die out.
I already moved in that direction. I got the lasik. Muahaha, fear my almost-perfect eyesight! I remember hating my glasses when I was a sophomore in high school. I remember thinking “If only there was a way they could just tweak my eyeball and then I won’t need these stupid things”. Then years later, I found out about lasik and was all scared of it until other people went through it first. It was one of the best decisions I ever made.
I’m also on borrowed time because I got my appendix out. I’d be dead if it wasn’t for modern medical science. Yay technological advances.
But then again, I’m not going to have any kids so I won’t be passing my inferior eye and appendix (and sinus for that matter) genes on anyway.
October 20, 2009 at 7:18 AM
UPDATE: According to this study:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17997-meet-future-woman-shorter-plumper-more-fertile.html
… This theory of mine is not true, and evolution is still happening.