To help pay down the debt, Republicans have decided to take $25 away from every child on child support. RFID = cancer. Least caloric alcohol. Cops raid house, burn it down, force pet dog into the fire, laugh at how the dog died, and refuse to let its corpse be cleaned up, causing neighbors to gag in their own yards for 5 days. Apology? No chance. This is America!
-
TECHNOLOGY WAR: New First: Ohio Court Admits Lie Detector Tests As Evidence
Lie detectors have always been inadmissable because their accuracy has always been poor. But in a typical incremental creep towards fascism and being able to selectively imprison,now we can be proven guilty by a black box. http://AntiPolygraph.org !!
-
2000 people already implanted,according to VeriChip. 10 yrs of research says 1% to 10% of RFID-implanted mice/rats developed malignant, fast-growing, lethal cancers, starting in the tissue around the RFID chips, often growing to completely surround them.
-
Oh, and the cops also managed to smash into a parked car too.They also forced the dead dog corpse to stink up the neighborhood for 5 days. Crime scene, y’know.
By the way.. tear gas canisters *DO* start fires.
-
INTOXICATION: A Study of Alco-fficiency: Feed the drunk, starve the beer belly
tables sorted by calories/per alcohol – find out which drink gets you drunkest for the least caloriesthis is actually useful…!
I like how they include non-alcoholic beers too, heh.
-
Each state must pass this law, or be denied federal funding.So do they take the extra $25 from the person paying child support? NO!
They take it away from the person RECEIVING the support (& thus the child)!
Sign the petition.
September 9, 2007 at 10:24 PM
[…] LINKS; Republican literally pay down debt with childrens’ future, lie detector tests suddenly … […]
September 10, 2007 at 10:49 AM
Cops can also lock you up and charge you when you oversalt their McDonald’s cheeseburger:
http://www.wistv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7047369
September 10, 2007 at 10:59 AM
Yea, I heard about that! I *almost* posted it, but there wasn’t much info on specifics in the article.
September 10, 2007 at 11:52 AM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2715792117793977759&hl=en
September 10, 2007 at 8:31 PM
Sounds like another disgusting story! Ugh!
September 10, 2007 at 11:43 PM
I would have probably gotten arrested and gone to jail. Then sued.
Personally, once cop#2 showed up, I think the guy kind of wussed out. He was well within his legal rights.
If you read the transcript, anybody notice cop #2’s concern with the cameras? Umm, cause he knows what cop#1 did was wrong.
Always carry a camera with you! I just got a new cell phone(well, it’s in the mail, I’ll get in wednesday) and the main feature I was looking for was: does it have a good camera?
September 11, 2007 at 7:27 AM
Well, the best feature of any camera would be realtime cellular upload such that the police can’t destroy your film…
For protests, I’d like to see a “camera swarm” that use wifi to share all pictures among all cameras, sort of like bittorrent.
September 11, 2007 at 11:25 AM
Yeah, realtime cellular upload would be the bomb. However, I was unable to find a phone with such a feature. I looked.
However, the cops don’t necessarily know that. Youtube does support direct uploading from mobile devices via MMS messaging. So just make sure you hit that send button before the phone gets ripped out of your hand.
The closest thing anybody has is live video messaging on AT&T. But that’s just phone to phone, and I don’t think it gets saved.
September 11, 2007 at 1:46 PM
Oops, I said bomb.
TRACERT …….
CONNECTION LOST
September 11, 2007 at 2:03 PM
Here’s an update to the google video I posted yesterday:
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/EF3667C80165B68086257353001498DC?OpenDocument
September 11, 2007 at 3:02 PM
Ahhh, justice. Only achievable with a camera.
And only for a short time, since Camera-busting technology exists. I expect it to be used to protect police brutality in the future.